3 ms·
It’s sad to think that we’re so deep into the gun lobby’s idea of normal society that you think what I am saying is “pro-gun rhetoric.” No, it’s not, my rhetori
by dangus 3y ago
It’s sad to think that we’re so deep into the gun lobby’s idea of normal society that you think what I am saying is “pro-gun rhetoric.” No, it’s not, my rhetoric is that of a person that wants to live in a society as the rest of the developed world understands it.
Here’s my reasoned argument: our government is verifiably deeply intertwined with gun organizations and manufacturers.
Without this influence we would see our nation’s wildly statistically abnormal situation as a cause for urgent action. Instead, we’ve been trained to think of that anything against our “freedom” to own guns as “anti-gun rhetoric.”
https://archive.is/sNDTt https://archive.is/sNDTt
- 0ct4via 3y agoWho is "we" in this? You're making things up, casing baseless assumptions, and I said "anti-gun rhetoric," not pro -- so if you're going to lie, at least don't make it something instantly disprovable. Your rhetoric is by your own admission rhetoric, and is demonstrably anti-gun, therefore "anti-gun rhetoric" is an accurate observation to make -- why are you getting triggered about that? I didn't say the NRA wasn't a steaming pile of trash. I didn't say there weren't issues with big gun manufacturers getting into bed with politicians, just as happens with corporations across the entire capitalist hellscale -- that's the nature of it. Instead, you just made baseless assumptions (which you're patently wrong about) and lashed out with your spiel. Don't assume. Quit trolling. Try harder next time.
- dangus 3y agoI meant “anti-gun,” that was a typographical error. What did you think of the article I sent? I’m not triggered by anything. I’m not trolling. I’m just disappointed.