4 ms·
I can only read the abstract, but this doesn't look very solid at all. It's a self-reported non-randomized study, and an absurdly large number of participants h
by fsh 3y ago
I can only read the abstract, but this doesn't look very solid at all. It's a self-reported non-randomized study, and an absurdly large number of participants has had some type of skin cancer (184 out of 276). This makes the results extremely susceptible to selection bias.
- fatfingerd 3y agoI think by "at risk" they mean they are doing an intentional selection bias on probable skin conditions and it really isn't meant for conclusions..