3 ms·

Is the goal decarbonization or is the goal something else? If that is the goal and it's that important, I think errors of omission as as bad as errors of inclus

Is the goal decarbonization or is the goal something else? If that is the goal and it's that important, I think errors of omission as as bad as errors of inclusion. For decade environmentalists have asked for political martyrdom (por political petard). It's never worked, unless you count Putin pissing off his natural gas customers (lol). Acting like that is the only strategy again and again is just irresponsible.

operatingthetan 3y ago
>I think errors of omission as as bad as errors of inclusion. A stylistic choice like scope is not an error, so neither. >Acting like that is the only strategy again and again is just irresponsible. The article did not, you are attacking a strawman.