4 ms·
If this is "antivax", then it's only pretty mildly such: > mRNA-1273 vaccine-associated myocardial injury was more common than previously thought, being mild a
by yellowapple 3y ago
If this is "antivax", then it's only pretty mildly such:
> mRNA-1273 vaccine-associated myocardial injury was more common than previously thought, being mild and transient, and more frequent in women versus men. The possible protective role of IFN-λ1(IL-29) and GM-CSF warrant further studies.
A mild and temporary case of inflammation - affecting the exact opposite demographic the antivaxxers harped upon - is hardly some vindication of the antivax cause. A vaccine having side effects ain't mutually exclusive with it being safe and effective.
- Gibbon1 3y agoIt's totally anti-vax or paranoiac because if these were studies about some other drug side effect no one but no one would care at all. Even a doctor that treats patients with a drug with a similar side effect would just completely lose interest when he reads that the rate is a few per million and it resolves itself. Doesn't help the anti-vaxers and paranoiacs can't be reasoned with at all.
- yellowapple 3y agoThat all has nothing to do with this study (or its findings) and everything to do with antivaxxers being intellectually dishonest.