Despite your best attempts to skim-read and then cake a Hindu-nationalist veneer on it, what you're saying is not even close to what this article is saying, eve

Despite your best attempts to skim-read and then cake a Hindu-nationalist veneer on it, what you're saying is not even close to what this article is saying, even if it were correct. No serious scholar argues for an origin of the the language tree in the subcontinent or Iran. Also nobody other than Nazis calls the Aryans "European"; The origin of the Indo-European language family tree is from the Pontic-Caspian steppe region; what is today southeastern Ukraine and southern Russia, roughly from the Dniepro to the Volga. The "Aryans" (really multiple names and multiple peoples) were people who moved eastwards from there, carrying early Indo-Iranian languages with them. (Over a 1000+ year history, winding their way eastwards across central Asia, so I'm not sure how you could spin that as "European")