4 ms·
>The article is entirely about reduction of consumption, and the strings like "electri" "invest" "density" do not appear anywhere within it. I mean a writer ne
by operatingthetan 3y ago
>The article is entirely about reduction of consumption, and the strings like "electri" "invest" "density" do not appear anywhere within it.
I mean a writer needs to actually say something in order for you to criticize it, failing to mention something or focusing the article on a particular topic of discussion isn't a position.
- Ericson2314 3y agoIs the goal decarbonization or is the goal something else? If that is the goal and it's that important, I think errors of omission as as bad as errors of inclusion. For decade environmentalists have asked for political martyrdom (por political petard). It's never worked, unless you count Putin pissing off his natural gas customers (lol). Acting like that is the only strategy again and again is just irresponsible.
- operatingthetan 3y ago>I think errors of omission as as bad as errors of inclusion. A stylistic choice like scope is not an error, so neither. >Acting like that is the only strategy again and again is just irresponsible. The article did not, you are attacking a strawman.