> Yes more auditors for govt. Not more govt. auditors for business. It was your example. Explain then the point of your example, beyond “see, government must

> Yes more auditors for govt. Not more govt. auditors for business. It was your example. Explain then the point of your example, beyond “see, government must be incompetent.” Because I see a leap of logic in saying “government (org) +government (audit)” incompetence implies “private (org) + goverment (audit)” incompetence. Nevermind that all nuance was stripped away in making a one-liner.