I read an article some time ago that analyzed this in depth, and was very specific about a number of studies. I can't pull them out of my memory now, but I foun

I read an article some time ago that analyzed this in depth, and was very specific about a number of studies. I can't pull them out of my memory now, but I found the article very convincing. The ones that were less rigorous might be ones that you would count is "non-reputable". But they are considered reputable to people working in the field of homeopathy, who believe them, and the article included studies with control groups. But, for instance, studies that weren't double-blind, even if they had control groups, got more "results" showing that homeopathy "worked" than studies that didn't. And note that you can't really have double-blind studies for psychotherapy.