3 ms·
You could remove all the arcane laws, regulations, and zoning which make constructing new houses ludicrously expensive. Most people would be perfectly happy to
by mostlylurks 3y ago
You could remove all the arcane laws, regulations, and zoning which make constructing new houses ludicrously expensive. Most people would be perfectly happy to live even in a shoddy log cabin built by them and their family if it meant they would could save those hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars they would've spent otherwise to improve their lives in other ways. This alone could be enough to shave decades off the career of the average person.
You could disallow corporate ownership of dwellings of any sort, and heavily tax ownership of more than two homes per family unit.
You could provide significant tax benefits to lifestyles that approach self-sufficiency, such as people in rural areas that grow their own food.
You could mandate a quota of completely remote workers for many industries, encouraging the diffusion of people and opportunities across the country, instead of everyone rushing to expensive cities in hopes of finding work.
- brookst 3y ago> You could disallow corporate ownership of dwellings of any sort Does that mean no high density residential? I can’t see how individuals build apartment buildings.
- jddj 3y agoHow do individuals end up owning apartments today?
- brookst 3y agoThey mostly don’t? I’m sure there are a few, but the vast majority are financed, built, and operated by corporations.
- jddj 3y agoI don't know enough about the US market to speak too strongly here, but I'd have to imagine based on my experience elsewhere that if you wanted to buy a flat from a property developer right now you could. I would have thought that "build to let" would be the rarer case, but like I said I might be blind to the idiosyncrasies of the US here