2 ms·
Noam Chomsky: "For two millennia the idea of getting a job was regarded as a fundamental attack against basic human rights and human dignity. Why? Because gett
by z7 3y ago
Noam Chomsky:
"For two millennia the idea of getting a job was regarded as a fundamental attack against basic human rights and human dignity. Why? Because getting a job means accepting servitude to a master. It means saying, 'Okay, I'll rent myself to you for most of my waking life and I will follow your orders during this period.' That was considered an utter abomination. By now it's sort of taken for granted. But should we take it for granted? Or should we go back to the ideals of working people, classical liberals, Cicero, all the way to Abraham Lincoln, saying that this is not a decent way for human beings to live, that people should be in control of their own work and their own destiny. One of the founders of classical liberalism, Wilhelm von Humboldt, captured the point very lucidly. He said, suppose an artisan creates a beautiful object on command, in a job. We may admire what he did, but we despise what he is: a tool in the hands of others. That was common belief right through the nineteenth century. We now accept that renting yourself into servitude is one of the highest goals in life – an idea that would have been an abomination for 2000 years."
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6MU5zQwtT4&t=3540s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6MU5zQwtT4&t=3540s
- AntiRemote 3y ago[dead]
- bmmayer1 3y agoWhat evidence is there of people 2000 years ago claiming that having a "job" was a "fundamental attack against basic human rights and human dignity."?
- mikestew 3y agoWe may admire what he did, but we despise what he is: a tool in the hands of others. Chomsky can be so full of shit at times. I’d like one piece of writing from before the 19th century, perhaps just a morsel of evidence that this was a “common belief” among anyone but the elite that have time to sit and write things all day.