> It's not "both sidesing" in the same sense as debate, but [emphasis mine] Ha! Seeing you use a literal non-sequitur to as a counter is a perfect illustration

> It's not "both sidesing" in the same sense as debate, but [emphasis mine] Ha! Seeing you use a literal non-sequitur to as a counter is a perfect illustration of why rhetoric exercises aren't an automatic pathway to sound logical reasoning. (Explicitly the argument by edanm goes: "I hold the proposition 'A does not do B' is not true, because A does C")