> because it would remove the commercial incentive to innovate Not so. In a world were the FSF got their way: Organizations with a need for specialized softw

> because it would remove the commercial incentive to innovate Not so. In a world were the FSF got their way: Organizations with a need for specialized software would be able to contract programmers to bring that software into existence. It's not as though every other profession in the world would throw up their hands and say they couldn't use computers anymore just because software could no longer be copyrighted.