> In one of my cases the prosecution had an expert witness that stated some totally wrong facts about visibility during sunset. That kind of stuff makes me pro

> In one of my cases the prosecution had an expert witness that stated some totally wrong facts about visibility during sunset. That kind of stuff makes me profoundly uncomfortable. Presumably, too, since the judge doesn't participate in the jury deliberations at all, the (un)credibility of said expert witness never saw the light of day. Did the accused's side raise that possibility during cross-examination at all?