4 ms·
Confluence search isn't that bad. What is bad is the data that is fed into it. It has no way of understanding what is more relevant: some doc from 10 years ag
by starik36 3y ago
Confluence search isn't that bad. What is bad is the data that is fed into it. It has no way of understanding what is more relevant: some doc from 10 years ago or something related from recently.
- TheRealPomax 3y agoSo what you're saying is that Confluence search is bad, because it has no understanding of relevance, something we figured how to do even before the PageRank algorithm got published in 1998? Search is meant to help humans find what they need to find. If your search function doesn't (and Confluence's sure as hell doesn't) then it's bad. And arguably, plain mislabeled because it's not performing searches. At best, it's grepping.
- starik36 3y agoPageRank is based people linking using huge scale of the entire internet. It’s difficult to infer importance based on a couple of thousand documents at most.
- TheRealPomax 3y agoNo, it isn't. It was, back in the 90s. But full text linked document indexing was a fully solved problem by 2012, and Confluence put genuine effort into not using any of the existing solutions and instead went with "You get grep. Not search. Sucks to be you".