4 ms·
The trouble is you need a ton of water and fertilizer to support that growth, and drought combined with soil quality degradation is already a huge problem in a
by BaseballPhysics 3y ago
The trouble is you need a ton of water and fertilizer to support that growth, and drought combined with soil quality degradation is already a huge problem in a lot of regions, and will only become moreso as the globe warms and, p.s., fertilizer production is heavily dependent on petrochemicals and contributes to CO2 emissions.
It could be a huge development, no doubt, but there are many bottlenecks in agricultural production, so we need to be careful not to oversell this as some kind of panacea.
- dtgriscom 3y agoWould it take more water and fertilizer per pound of crop? If not, then that's a wash.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- BaseballPhysics 3y agoThe claim was this technology would increase carrying capacity. That implies growing more food, not growing the same amount of food on less land. I agree, as far as being able to use less land for agriculture, this could be a beneficial development. Only problem is that's not how humans typically work.