2 ms·
None of those strike me as a true duplicate of the Smithsonian magazine article. Different angles for the same phenomenon, sure, but they each provide valuable
by cratermoon 3y ago
None of those strike me as a true duplicate of the Smithsonian magazine article. Different angles for the same phenomenon, sure, but they each provide valuable contributions and context for the event.
- ChrisArchitect 3y agoIt's a dupe. An article from days ago covering the same story as the others and most of the discussion 205 comments in is on that first link. Don't need more threads repeating especially submitted days later when the convo settled on the one thread