3 ms·
Yeah, that guy was linked in the Twitter list above. The papers on arXiv are "crap" because they weren't ready for publication... the actual team's paper has b
by Accujack 3y ago
Yeah, that guy was linked in the Twitter list above.
The papers on arXiv are "crap" because they weren't ready for publication... the actual team's paper has been submitted for peer review to a respected journal and is being looked at/corrected/tested.
What got published was leaked, hence the poor quality work.
Check the twitter list for more info.
- uejfiweun 3y agoAh, I see, sorry for not checking ahead. Unfortunately it seems the link is blocked behind the auth wall and I would rather not make a new social media account, but that's good to hear that it's more legitimate than that thread would suggest, thanks for the info.
- jodrellblank 3y agoChange URL to use Nitter to view without logging in: https://nitter.net/i/lists/1684446795731206144 https://nitter.net/i/lists/1684446795731206144
- numpad0 3y agoNot sure how to take that "weren't ready for publication" thing. That kind of wording is not rare in fabrication cases.
- carabiner 3y agoWhich "respected journal" is it?