3 ms·
I was thinking the same thing. Why not limit input through the api to 1 grapheme if misuse is the worry? Or why accept all emoji and not a sensible sublist like
by rahkiin 3y ago
I was thinking the same thing. Why not limit input through the api to 1 grapheme if misuse is the worry?
Or why accept all emoji and not a sensible sublist like Notion?
- Kerrick 3y agoThe end of The article describes how 1 grapheme is a mostly good solution except that not all emoji work with the JS used to validate that, and the JS to validate it isn’t available in Firefox.
- rahkiin 3y agoBut this would be a back-end check, not a front-end check. Why would lack of support in Firefox matter?