4 ms·
"If I can use a workaround to conform this I would not care if people gets affected" This is not about you or me but Google having a high level of control over
by fsniper 3y ago
"If I can use a workaround to conform this I would not care if people gets affected"
This is not about you or me but Google having a high level of control over www access, and trying to cement it for good.
With this proposal if you are not conformant according to a very loosely defined, - heck not defined at all - attestation you will be kept outside of the www. The control will be adopted with big or small parties in time.
Consider a scenario where ad-networks not paying participants who does not attest via their selected attestor.. How long would it take the whole service industry to adopt "select" attestors?
- skydhash 3y ago> Consider a scenario where ad-networks not paying participants who does not attest via their selected attestor.. How long would it take the whole service industry to adopt "select" attestors? Anyone showing ads to me instead of taking my money is just fooling themselves. Because I block most of them, and the unskippable ones (twitch), I mute or I move to something else. YouTube does not show ads in my country, and this is the only reason I still use it on my Apple TV. If the whole service adopts it (I don't foresee it), that means they don't want me as a customer. So unless something is essential (government services,...), I wouldn't bother with them, and the list of essential things is very short. But I don't foresee it. Restricting your user base like this by enforcing correct browsers and platforms means doing the work for any competitor that does not.