3 ms·
I completely agree with this. If you’re arguing against trickle-down economics you should know where people arguing for it are coming from and be able to phrase
by rutierut 3y ago
I completely agree with this. If you’re arguing against trickle-down economics you should know where people arguing for it are coming from and be able to phrase it in a manner that its proponents agree with.
This also happens to be one of the most (holistically) effective techniques irl when “debating” with someone.
- vacuity 3y agoSounds like Chesterton's fence. "Tear it down!" "OK, but can you give me a good reason to?" "...It's an obstruction." "Reeeeeal persuasive." Even if the other side has abysmal reasoning, you won't be able to distinguish that from decent arguments if you blindly try to push your side of things. Besides, establishing common ground is key to cooperation.