> It should be all or nothing if the reason is free speech, no? No. Free speech isn't really all or nothing on a societal level, like most things in the real w

> It should be all or nothing if the reason is free speech, no? No. Free speech isn't really all or nothing on a societal level, like most things in the real world. Sane limitations on free speech are a well-trodden concept; calls to action for violence and shouting fire are good examples. Whether or not those limitations are applied ethically everywhere is a whole different topic, though.