3 ms·
So that people in poorer countries can use more of them in our place to industrialize and then join everyone else in the gangrape of our environment!
by BasedAnon 3y ago
So that people in poorer countries can use more of them in our place to industrialize and then join everyone else in the gangrape of our environment!
- danny_codes 3y agoBut this won't happen. Fossil fuels are the cheapest energy source because of they are already established (economy of scale) and are subsidized heavily. In a world were all major economies have shifted to nuclear power, solar power, and wind power, that will no longer be the case. It will be cheaper for developing countries to use green tech. Also, once the powerful countries have moved off fossil-fuels, we'll hypocritically force poor countries not to use them anyway. Come now, be reasonable.
- myshpa 3y agohttps://i.imgur.com/LaEFQmV.png https://i.imgur.com/LaEFQmV.png Source: https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/621305/bn-carbon-inequality-2030-051121-en.pdf;jsessionid=D5606408065DFEF96A8D0E4C8CABDA50?sequence=1 https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10...
- BasedAnon 3y agoWhat does this have to do with my point, I clearly said they would industrialize
- myshpa 3y agoWe could go down a lot, and let them come up a bit higher, so that the change would be still climate positive. Or have I misunderstood your comment?
- BasedAnon 3y agoWe don't have the ability to go down alot without killing alot of people, and if they come up it will not be possible to limit it because game theory