4 ms·
Your argument appears incomplete. Either there is some method of obtaining "a true expression of public views in the wide", in which case: What is it? Or there
by majewsky 3y ago
Your argument appears incomplete. Either there is some method of obtaining "a true expression of public views in the wide", in which case: What is it?
Or there is no such method, in which case: Why do you specifically advise to drop social media channels? What makes them less valuable as a method of gauging public views than, say, talking to a taxi driver, or an opinion poll? You are suggesting that I drop every belief that each one of these parts accurately represents the whole, but then why specifically ask us to drop out of one of these methods over any other?
- ggm 3y agoNothing makes them less valuable. They're mostly just as valuable. The problem is belief they're more representative, more "real" I advise to drop because of cumulative deleterious effects on my mental health and real world social relationships. Some people may have more resilience. I think most people become trapped in mostly narcissistic behaviour.
- seydor 3y agoMost people just don't want to shout things, and the ones that do are a tiny unrepresentative minority. Imho it's that simple, and has been from the get-go