3 ms·
Having skipped to his analysis of the video, I find him pretty convincing. He explains why the video is bunk using information provided by the lab, and basic p
by ArnoVW 3y ago
Having skipped to his analysis of the video, I find him pretty convincing.
He explains why the video is bunk using information provided by the lab, and basic physics. And then 'replicates' using his own sheet of metal and a magnet.
Also, he raises the fact that it's a commercial lab.
I've downgraded my level expectations a couple of orders of magnitude. But hey, let's hope for a miracle.
- harrid 3y agoI liked his actual point, too! But it's being devalued by his demeanor
- seiferteric 3y agoJust watching it. He brought up something I noticed also, showing the magnet moving the hanging copper plate with the material deposited on it... In like basic physics class you go over eddy currents induced by moving magnets, isn't that all we see there? I can't understand how this showed anything other than that? Thunderfoot comment though seems ridiculous. It would be irrelevant because it is a ceramic??? lol. They proposed a mechanism how it works! Obviously this would just be the first step. That's like saying the first transistor was irrelevant because we don't use that design anymore.