3 ms·
I wrote a comprehensive thread on the current situation here. It is somewhat long and hard to summarize, sorry. https://twitter.com/sanxiyn/status/168509402911
by sanxiyn 3y ago
I wrote a comprehensive thread on the current situation here. It is somewhat long and hard to summarize, sorry.
https://twitter.com/sanxiyn/status/1685094029116297216 https://twitter.com/sanxiyn/status/1685094029116297216
- doctoboggan 3y agoCan you post a link to one of the mirrors that lets logged out people read the thread?
- carabiner 3y agoYes this is an excellent thread. You have done some of the only on the ground reporting from Seoul. The takedowns you linked of the paper, CMTC giving it an F, are damning. There's one legit professor Kim from William & Mary who had a tiny part of this, but more and more, it looks like it's the output of a few cranks out of a "Q-Centre." The bulk of the work took place before Kim's involvement and he's listed on 1 of 3 papers so far. He's the only thread of legitimacy in this whole thing, and it's a thin one. The 5 other guys are just loony.
- callalex 3y agoPaywall
- krasin 3y agoSame thread on nitter: https://nitter.net/sanxiyn/status/1685094029116297216 https://nitter.net/sanxiyn/status/1685094029116297216
- gausswho 3y agoI love the self-deprecating humor of the introduction, esp the ice cream bit. Well done.
- Accujack 3y agoThe reason the papers look like junk is that they were leaked by a rogue former team member who wants credit. The papers weren't supposed to have been published yet, peer review is still ongoing.