I am a bit confused by the case that is wanting to use the researchers data. So there was measurable learning loss from remote learning and during the pandemic

I am a bit confused by the case that is wanting to use the researchers data. So there was measurable learning loss from remote learning and during the pandemic. Ok this is known in education. The state has only relied on individual districts to make up the learning loss. Ok so that makes sense. There is no magic bullet on fixing the learning loss issue. The state relying on individual districts taking a multi approach to learning loss .. seems reasonable. I don’t understand the merits of the lawsuit. The state of California is already aware of learning loss and is looking at ways to address. To be sued because the state of California didn’t do x,y,z by the paintings seems incredible short sided and unrealistic. We are still learning how to best address learning loss from 2020. Just my two cents