4 ms·
*inspects the page Yeah, you're right. That's not so bad. It just seemed like it was claiming a lot of precision that, from my own experience of javascript, b
by phillmv 15y ago
*inspects the page
Yeah, you're right. That's not so bad.
It just seemed like it was claiming a lot of precision that, from my own experience of javascript, browsers and network latency, seemed a bit over the top. (Granted, on the order of magnitude of seconds, I'll accept that. Less than 100 ms and I grow suspicious).
- dfc 15y agowhat does your machine say for "ntpq -p" and "ntptime"?