3 ms·
Right, so why they are bothering ? The technical limit is known and it is making it barely acceptable if it was free (because you still need to have dedicated i
by ilyt 3y ago
Right, so why they are bothering ? The technical limit is known and it is making it barely acceptable if it was free (because you still need to have dedicated inverter channel for the power conversion as characteristics are much different than what solar panels generate).
And if it wasn't free or near-free it's competing with putting one more panel or adding one more battery to the system. Or... just big, cheap funnel that is feeding water generator Sure you lose some of the velocity but it is so much simpler system
Like, generating energy from tiny movements have its niches (like sensors powered by piezoelectrics from vibrations of machine they monitor), but using it for raindrops just feels like a waste of time, most areas don't even get enough rain for that to matter.
Now if they figured out to do it to airflow with few moving parts, that would be more interesting.