5 ms·
I've ported dozens of services many production critical over to SystemD over several companies. The only thing I've ever had issue with is systemd-timesyncd. Ot
by tekla 3y ago
I've ported dozens of services many production critical over to SystemD over several companies. The only thing I've ever had issue with is systemd-timesyncd. Otherwise, its been rock solid. What the hell are you doing that gives you so much trouble with SystemD
- bravetraveler 3y agoDitto, much success with systemd here. The 'overreach' people complain about exists for a good reason. Services need mounts/networks/etc to actually do their job reliably. If people could discard the 'nyeh' sentiment, use recent releases, and actually engage with the system, they can only find more reliability. What was once tailored in scripts for each service/job/whatever is now provided by the system It's about clearly laying out dependencies. Not a lot more. The only bad experience I've had with systemd is on Ubuntu 18; where I've been forced at work. It's common for systemctl daemon-reexec to be needed, to resuscitate it. It's woefully far behind.
- freedomben 3y ago18.04 is EOL! unless they're paying for that extended support, it's time to upgrade
- bravetraveler 3y agoI should've probably mentioned this, but we've got that covered! ESM until we can finish our move to the New Home I appreciate the mention though, never know how long people intend to keep things running.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]