5 ms·
Will this still work now that VHF and UHF are no more?
by kamranjon 3y ago
Will this still work now that VHF and UHF are no more?
- jpl56 3y agoYes, but just as before, you need multiple dipoles since there are multiple frequencies. Digital allows multiple channels where we had one analog.
- pessimizer 3y agoI'm literally still using the last antenna I had for my last CRT tv, and my reception is great.
- AlbertCory 3y agoMine looks like a figure-8. And only about 3 feet high and 18 inches wide, more or less.
- op00to 3y agoDepends on how close you are to the transmitters.
- pessimizer 3y agoVHF and UHF are still almost as they were. It was the format that changed, not the frequency. UHF only goes up to channel 52 now, though. Before 2009 it went up to channel 70, and before 1983 UHF went all the way up to 83.
- AlbertCory 3y agoIt's a whole other world out there! But yeah, you can get the big sporting events, e.g. some of the Women's World Cup matches (the ones the US team is in). When I first connected it, I cycled through ALL the channels. There were about 800.
- op00to 3y agoI don’t know about outside of the US, but “HDTV” in the US is on the same old vhf and uhf bands as their analog predecessors exempting some carve outs for cellular. The antenna lengths will be the same.
- ansible 3y agoVHF has gone away in some areas, as I understand it. It is all gone in the Chicago metro area, now all HDTV is broadcast on UHF channels only. And thank goodness for that! For a while, CBS 2 Chicago was on VHF channel 12, and was limited in power. So the reception outside the city limits was rather poor, even for relatively close-in suburbs. They finally got 48.2 allocated, and that comes in much better, much further out. It was frustrating, because the other major & minor channels were already on UHF and came in fine.
- op00to 3y agoPhilly has one channel on VHF LO but thankfully the transmitters are in a great location so you don’t really need a huge antenna if you’re close to the city.