3 ms·
Nah, wikipedia is highly manipulated. Maybe a git repo would work better.
by andreygrehov 3y ago
Nah, wikipedia is highly manipulated. Maybe a git repo would work better.
- Obscurity4340 3y agoAny particular examples/instances of that?
- andreygrehov 3y agoThe co-founder said it himself? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/wikipedia-founder-larry-sanger-democrats-b1885138.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politic...
- consumer451 3y agoThis would be a problem in any system I can imagine.
- regularjack 3y agoWhy should I trust a random git repo more than wikipedia? I don't think the format the data is stored as (git vs wiki) says anything about the reliability of the information.
- consumer451 3y agoWiki edits are already public. How would a git repo be better?
- andreygrehov 3y agoIt's certainly not a magic pill, but there is a higher barrier to entry for making en edit through git. PR discussions could help minimize bs.