11 ms·

What Happens When You Piss Off the Internet

• jamesu 15y ago
  The thing to remember is that behind every meme is a person. Someone spent time and effort to make a funny image or story, and they probably never got paid for it. Then someone comes along and tries to make money off of it: how would you feel?
  • tomjen3 15y ago
    He wanted to make it open source, so the money he would have made could only have been done through donations. Not exactly scum bag behavior.
    • jonl 15y ago
      That's what his blog says, but if you read the Kickstarter project page, it makes no mention of open source. It says that if you donate $2, you get a free copy of the full version. It also says that some of the Kickstarter money will go towards marketing. None of this sounds like he planned to make it free or open source at all. It sounds like he is trying to capitalize on intellectual property that he doesn't own the rights to.
  • Jach 15y ago
    I'd feel honored someone actually thought my output was good enough to try and make money off of, and good luck to them. Maybe I'll start competing since I could probably do a lot better. (Edit: in case my more general point is lost here, that general point is that we shouldn't be basing our policies on feelings.)
  • polemic 15y ago
    You don't own a meme. Heck, that's almost an oxymoron: "an idea, behavior, style, or usage that spreads from person to person within a culture" - http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/meme http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/meme And who actually makes money from meme's anyway? Is YouTube scum for making money from showing video memes? Likewise for 4chan (the website, not the community) and Reddit? The advertisers that buy ads on those pages? What about memegenerators? Double standards?
    • smashing 15y ago
      The obvious answer is that the content being discussed isn't really a meme. They are copyrighted images. The idea of a "Troll Face" can be a meme, surely, but the specific image of a trollface that is widely recognized was obviously copyrighted. If you don't like that then create your own image and release it with a more permissive license like Public Domain.
    • stfu 15y ago
      Every site mentioned helps to create new memes and supports the "infrastructure" of motivating other to come up with new memes. The meme defense projects seems to try capitalizing from just popular memes by making them even more popular. YouTube,4chan,Reddit are like a complex network of indie music clubs. Meme Defender is acting like a major label, that just takes well known "scene" memes and exploiting them towards a non-meme audience. No wonder the "true fans" are screaming sell-out.
    • notatoad 15y ago
      What about 'all the things'? It's a frame pulled from a hyperbole and a half comic strip. Are you saying nobody owns that image, just because it's become popular?
  • adelevie 15y ago
    I love it when I spend time writing open source software that people use for free. If a business uses it and earns money because of it, I'm even more delighted. If you choose to put something creative out into the ether, you should have the expectation that if it's good there are going to be copies and other derivations. If you can't stomach this or can't afford legal counsel to enforce your IP, keep your creative works off the Internet. The world is a better place because of "unsolicited collaboration".
• easterisle 15y ago
  I think these communities are worried about the culture they've created becoming more commercialized than it already is?
  • Zarkonnen 15y ago
    Absolutely. I have this theory that part of the reason that meme culture is often so absurd, obscure and frequently offensive exactly to prevent its co-option and commercialization.
    • Jimmie 15y ago
      Case and point: Two years ago Hot Topic started selling "rage guy" t-shirts. The internet decided it would be having none of that and coerced the meme "rage guy" into "race guy" by pumping out tonnes of racist comics. Hot Topic were forced to withdraw its t-shirt range. http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/race-guy http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/race-guy
      • tedunangst 15y ago
        I don't really track Hot Topics current inventory, but the same page you link to says they unwithdrew it one day later.
        • Jimmie 15y ago
          Huh, I didn't know that. I was working from memory and didn't read the article. I wonder if they still sell the shirts?
• tocomment 15y ago
  I really couldn't follow this. Can anyone explain it?
• avar 15y ago
  The Internet gives douchebags a soapbox, news at 11.
• thebigredjay 15y ago
  You have two problems: 1. On the internet large amounts of traffic means that you will have trolls galore. In my eyes some of those comments are normal internet fodder and just need to be moderated out. 2. You are using IP that you do not own. Memes are not public domain. Of course that is going to get people angry, particularly when there is money involved.
  • buf 15y ago
    1. Point taken. 2. Even under fair use? How do sites like memegenerator, knowyourmeme, and others get away with it? They make money. My project was free.
    • thebigredjay 15y ago
      Fair use is a fickle beast and not something to rely on. I have no idea how those sites exist without lawsuits but I would not consider them shining examples of web success.
    • smashing 15y ago
      My advice is to contact "memegenerator, knowyourmeme, and others" and ask them what licensing agreements they have with the copyright holders that allow them publish the content. You may be surprised to learn how much or how little money changes hand.
      • buf 15y ago
        I spoke with the founder/owner of campusmemes.com asking the same questions. He basically said, "We operate business as usual until we get a C&D. Remove the image. Life goes on."
        • smashing 15y ago
          Hmm, The Monetization of Copyrighted Content without any Licenses sounds more like a service than a software product. Maybe try to obtain license agreements from the copyright holders and put the funding for agree'ed to licenses in the Kickstarter campaign.
• paulhauggis 15y ago
  I got death threats when I followed the open source license, but tried to make money on my own app. It utilized an app under the GNU license. The problem with open source (especially anything involving the GNU) is that although you can make money, the majority (not all) will make it very difficult for you to do this.
• zotz 15y ago
  > Most of what Internet communities like 4chan, Reddit, and 9gag produce are highly-regarded garbage. Why does he want to smear poor, innocent garbage? At least garbage composts into something useful.
• hallnoates 15y ago
  I can't believe anyone is taking this seriously. This was the guy's strongest critic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2LmjiTduSe0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2... Regardless of their position on the matter, they are all attention whores.
• IsaacL 15y ago
  I feel your pain. I had something similar happen to me -- though not to the same degree. Recently I was selling posters based on a meme unique to my campus -- the designs were our own (so we had the copyright), but the original concept the memes were based on was not. (Imagine you sold a photo of your own cat with the text "I can haz cheezburger" -- it's still your copyright, right?) Anyway, some guy started posting that we were fraudsters, were raping culture, etc. It's funny, our troll sounded just like yours -- obviously intelligent and articulate, but took something trivial (internet memes) way too seriously. I really can't understand the mindset of these people -- when I noticed that reddit was becoming a waste of time, I didn't post a long rant about it -- I just stopped going to reddit. If it's any comfort, know that such people likely have little else going on in their life, and trolling in defence of their online "tribe" is all they have. If you're actually creating stuff, being entrepreneurial, putting yourself out there, you're already beating them.
• rickmb 15y ago
  You want to exploit something you consider "garbage" but which has a certain value to the people that create and/or perpetuate it, and you find it odd that it would piss those people off? This has nothing to do with "the internet" or Reddit, or 4chan or whatever. You try to do this with some local group of people that's involved in whatever kind of hobby or activity you consider weird, or "garbage", and you'll get more or less the same response.
  • stfu 15y ago
    Plus the other aspect is that he is taking stuff that other people built for their own enjoyment and trying to exploit it in a commercial context. If he had tried pulling together an open source development team nobody would have been seriously offended. But what this guy is doing is the same as taking art done by anonymous street artists and selling merchandise based on it. If people pay before or after the production doesn't matter in that case. Acting totally surprised when "the street" is fighting back seems slightly naive.
    • Domenic_S 15y ago
      FTA: > When I sought out on the endeavor to create a mobile tower defense game, I announced that the game would be open source, and it would be free. What are you talking about?
      • lwat 15y ago
        He means the money raising on Kickstarter
        • andolanra 15y ago
          No, but that's an understandable cultural misconception. The money is relevant, but not the main issue at hand. In these communities, nobody cares about money, because your standing in the community isn't determined by how much money you have, but by how much you have contributed. This is kind of implicit in 4chan users, where it's considered tacky to even claim explicit ownership, because memes are understood to be products of an amorphous community. It's explicit on places like Reddit, where cultural standing is measured as a number. Yes, the author would not be receiving money for this product, but having created the game as himself (as opposed to as, say, a semi-anonymous Newgrounds member) he draws more ire. Contrast the relevant videos: the original Kickstarter video features a single strong personality, a person mediating the experience of the memes in the game, while the response video is relatively anonymous, attempting to minimize the mediation between the viewer and his point. The fact that the response video also calls out other YouTube celebrities who do the same thing—i.e. offer mediation and commentary of other content through an explicit personality—should be incredibly telling. Other comments that say things like, "I'd be honored to have my content featured in someone's game," are missing the point. It's a basic culture clash: the article's author expresses distinct authorship which can be traced to a concrete person (or persona), even if he gets no profit and open-sources the result, while the people who make up the response understand that authorship as contrary to the whole point of communal humor, i.e. memes. The other meme aggregation sites are also 'mediators' of a sort, preventing people from experiencing the direct product of the community.
• deleted 15y ago
  [deleted]
• i_cannot_hack 15y ago
  Say what you will about it, but Whynne's recording was actually genuinely funny.
• beernutz 15y ago
  Please don't let the haters hold you back. The entire creative world is awash with re-mixes. This is nothing to be ashamed of or to avoid. Contrary to what some seem to believe, NOTHING is created in a vacuum. Everyone is influenced by others. The extent to which you show your influences in your work is really just part of your creative process in my opinion. I hope you find a way to make your game regardless of all the "original" people that think they are better somehow than those who are re-mixing to create something new with the culture they love.
• nomaningme 15y ago
  In the future, everyone will be threatened with death for 15 minutes.
• mquander 15y ago
  "The point that I’m trying to make is if you’re going to spent months of your time and thousands of your dollars drafting a concept, hiring a team, and building a free and completely open source video game as a hobby, you better use zombies as your theme." That is not the right thing to have learned from this. I suggest this one: If you're going to take a bunch of ideas and content wholesale from a community for your new thing, it might be good if you engage with that community and make something that respects the context of the stuff you're taking, instead of making something they'll perceive as cheap and foreign.
  • Confusion 15y ago
    Which community would that be? 4chan? Reddit? The rest of the internet that also regurgitates memes? You cannot 'engage with' the internet as a whole. No community owns a meme: it's the fact that so many people reproduce them that makes it a meme. The problem here is that some folks do feel they, or their community, own a meme. These people are the problem, not this guy with a place for a game. Or at least, he's another kind of problem.
    • mquander 15y ago
      The engaging with the community isn't so that you can make a petition that says, "Are you cool with my game [Y/N]" and have everyone on the Internet sign it. It's so that you can create something which demonstrates an awareness of the culture and doesn't come off as derivative and shallow to the people who deal in it daily and care to defend it. If he had made a post on Reddit or talked to anyone on 4chan and said "I want to make a meme-themed iOS game, help me make it not suck" and listened, he probably would have wound up making something that did not entice people to mock him and insult him. That's what I mean about engaging.
• internetcitizen 15y ago
  Off the top of my head, this already worked for... CollegeHumor - Cashed out. EbaumsWorld - Cashed out. Knowyourmeme - Cashed out. The entire Cheezeburger network.
• mcmonkey 15y ago
  I thought the video was funny, and when I read your post I just assumed that it would turn out that the art studio that you were going to hire turned out to have made the video as advertising for your game. To me it looks like awesome advertising, and it turns out that you got it for free, so why not just be happy? Ignore the trolls and see it from the bright side. =)
• jiggy2011 15y ago
  So, wait a minute. People draw some crappy pictures or take a crappy photo and slap an average joke over the top spread it around the internet and then get annoyed that someone puts it in a game? Why aren't they going after the people who endlessly re-post these things?
• naner 15y ago
  This guy asked for money for a project using 4chan memes and got abused for it. Not very surprising, they are a vindictive bunch and hate the popularization of their culture. Their wrath is even greater if it even appears that money is somehow involved. A couple of years ago Hot Topic made a shirt using the "Rage Guy" face from 4chan. They responded by rebranding the "Rage Guy" as "Race Guy" making tons of racist comics featuring the image and then complaining to Hot Topic for supporting racism.[1] 1: http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/race-guy http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/race-guy Unrelated Question: What happens on kickstarter when you pledge a project, they get tons of money, and then they don't deliver? For example, what if this guy gets enough to begin but he sucks at coding and isn't able to deliver anything like what he promised? Or what if someone were to just pocket the kickstarter money and disappear?
  • epaga 15y ago
    Donating to Kickstarter gives you no guarantees whatsoever. The guy can basically just walk away with the money if he so decides. No, really. This however makes it all the more a powerful concept in my mind, since the "makers" have to figure out how to communicate they are trustworthy AND have this great idea.
• coldarchon 15y ago
  Don't argue with idiots, they tear you down to their level and beat you with experience ..
• funkah 15y ago
  Right, all those communities are garbage because they were mean to you. But you're still gonna make your little game from the images and ideas those communities traffic in. So, what does that make your game?