2 ms·
They use the RT1 data which is (if I remember correctly) 11 month of data using like 6 research engineers sitting everyday, remote controlling the robot. They m
by NalNezumi 3y ago
They use the RT1 data which is (if I remember correctly) 11 month of data using like 6 research engineers sitting everyday, remote controlling the robot. They might even use ROSIE data which is data-augmentation using Stable-diffusion inpainting.
And for that they can do mobile manipulation, which have been possible for a long while (as long as we know ground-truth of object location, and have a some-what consistent map. Although the latter is solved with SLAM). it is way, way more versatile (if their claims are correct) so this is cool result.
as for sim2real, that's a whole different set of issue.... Simulator have come a long way, but from last time I talked with team-lead of Mujoco sim, it seems like completely realistic ones (at a reasonable compute time) is still far away. Deform-able objects are hard to simulate
My point is just that the "reasoning" you mention have a limit;[1] there's no amount of reasoning with language that can zero-shot a robot to do gymnastics or ride a bide. I'd be more than happy to be proven wrong on this point though, then my line of research is not dead-end =)
[1] https://youtu.be/x10964w00zk https://youtu.be/x10964w00zk
- blovescoffee 3y agoSure, I wouldn't say reasoning can guide a robot to do gymnastics zero-shot either. But it is a substantiated approach to generalizing existing capabilities - just like in humans. You or a robot can't reason your way to bike-riding but if you know how to bake cookies or brush your teeth, you can perform much better zero-shot on related tasks like baking a chicken or brushing a mirror.