The submitter was following the usual practice of using the article's title, so seem a bit harsh. Perhaps someone could repost with the title "Tolmasky propose

The submitter was following the usual practice of using the article's title, so seem a bit harsh. Perhaps someone could repost with the title "Tolmasky proposes Google's removal from W3C", then the flaggers (who I suspect may have other, more local motivation) wouldn't have that cover.