> reducing concentration of animal production would have a significant effect Yep, not gonna happen. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/nov/25/china

> reducing concentration of animal production would have a significant effect Yep, not gonna happen. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/nov/25/chinas-26-storey-pig-skyscraper-ready-to-produce-1-million-pigs-a-year https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/nov/25/chinas-2... https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-swinefever-muyuanfoods-change-s-idUSKBN28H0MU https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-swinefever-muyuanfo... 85,000 at one time, 1,000,000 every year. Second facility is being built. > a feeling hygiene ... would have a significant effect > when you have humans that regularly visit those buildings I think that at the necessary scale it's not possible. Disease transmission risk would still persist due to transportation and slaughter processes. Some diseases could spread via undercooked milk or meat, and then circulate undetected within humans for a long time. Even if we constructed near-sterile facilities, a significant number of operations worldwide would still be conducted unsafely. Avian influenza for example is spreading rapidly, allegedly even to wild mammals in South America, cross-contaminating our large domestic bird stocks and mutating there nobody-knows-how.