> No such shorthand exists in Ruby (and I'm glad that Ruby doesn't have the feature bloat like TypeScript and C#) I find that while Ruby’s syntax may have a sm

> No such shorthand exists in Ruby (and I'm glad that Ruby doesn't have the feature bloat like TypeScript and C#) I find that while Ruby’s syntax may have a smaller surface area there are so many more ways to do things than with other languages that I reach for others first. Also Ruby encourages so much metaprogramming that it can be very very difficult to work out where a behavior comes from. You _really_ have to document everything and getting a good editor config for Ruby is very important. That said I still struggle to get basic autocomplete working with Ruby in vs code