4 ms·

I also see the opposite happening: real footage of someone doing something nasty, and claiming it's a deepfake. If we get to the point where deepfakes are indis

• Cthulhu_ 3y ago
  That'll be an interesting one to see play out. Thing is though, forgeries / fake evidence in the form of image and video editing isn't anything new - how is that challenged in court these days? I can imagine they have an expert witness testify that it's fake or not, but they can and have been wrong as well.
• matheusmoreira 3y ago
  > does it mean footage can no longer be used in court? Perhaps we'll see the rise of cryptographically verified videos: the camera signs the output of their sensors, proving it was captured from the real world.
  • didntcheck 3y ago
    That's been suggested periodically for many years, but I'm not sure I'd ever trust it. I think people would always find a way to spoof the inputs, even if it's just by the analogue hole of focusing on a screen. This would be non-trivial, but both private and state espionage groups would be willing to pour a lot of money into the prospect of being able to have a "undeniably real" doctored image