> Have you read the book? The comment was based on reading the review. I assume the review covers all essential contributions of the book and it is not merely

> Have you read the book? The comment was based on reading the review. I assume the review covers all essential contributions of the book and it is not merely a promotion piece. I would be more inclined to take your "advice" if you had made any effort to address my concerns / observations. I suspect you simply can't. > Topology has a definition. It doesn’t mean anything different in this context. Thanks for the gratuitous and patronizing arrogance. It further reinforces my sense that these pompous sounding vacuities are a marketing tool and have no intrinsic applicability.