3 ms·
Have you read the book? Topology has a definition. It doesn’t mean anything different in this context. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topology https://en.m.wi
by elliotec 3y ago
Have you read the book?
Topology has a definition. It doesn’t mean anything different in this context. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topology https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topology
It seems like you’re just not willing to put in the effort of understanding the basics. Which would be fine if you didn’t plan on giving a review of the complexities.
- nologic01 3y ago> Have you read the book? The comment was based on reading the review. I assume the review covers all essential contributions of the book and it is not merely a promotion piece. I would be more inclined to take your "advice" if you had made any effort to address my concerns / observations. I suspect you simply can't. > Topology has a definition. It doesn’t mean anything different in this context. Thanks for the gratuitous and patronizing arrogance. It further reinforces my sense that these pompous sounding vacuities are a marketing tool and have no intrinsic applicability.
- gilleain 3y agoIt means properties of teams that are preserved under continuous deformations? Or does it just mean 'some structure over a set'? That could really cover anything ... While it is certainly useful to consider how you structure your teams, using the term 'topology' seems like marketing gloss. Also alliteration, of course.