Replying to myself: I've been musing on this subject all afternoon. I'm a user of Tarsnap, and I do find it expensive, in the sense that I would prefer to bac

Replying to myself: I've been musing on this subject all afternoon. I'm a user of Tarsnap, and I do find it expensive, in the sense that I would prefer to backup larger amounts of data for less amount of money. At the moment I backup photos separately from Tarsnap and in an adhoc way. But I still cannot figure out a way to get all the benefits I get from Tarsnap from any other software solution. * Must be usable under Nixos. * Backups must be asymmetrically encrypted so that backups can be automated, yet a compromise of the system cannot immediately gain read authorization to arcived data. * Backups must be append-only without further credentials, or otherwise prevent a compromised system from being able to delete existing archives. * Deduplication between archives while still allowing archives to independently be deleted. Using the ZFS snapshot functionality with rsync.net, for example, with Duplicity comes close. However, as I recall, duplicity wants to regular (typically monthly) full backups and then incremental backups from there. You cannot remove these full backups without deleting the entire month's worth of backups, and because the full backups are independently encrypted, there is (of course) no deduplication between full snapshots, even though the data is still likely largely the same. And because the snapshots are encrypted, it is impossible for the rsync.net storage to see or even know that large parts of the encrypted data is identical. AFAICT there is really nothing else that does what Tarsnap does.