3 ms·
I wrote a small piece sharing my views on the topic https://medium.com/@anandandbeyond/rethinking-open-source-for-the-era-of-ai-model-sharing-5b1e770a799d https
by aaur0 3y ago
I wrote a small piece sharing my views on the topic https://medium.com/@anandandbeyond/rethinking-open-source-for-the-era-of-ai-model-sharing-5b1e770a799d https://medium.com/@anandandbeyond/rethinking-open-source-fo...
- version_five 3y agoAnd posted the link to your subscribers only medium page twice in this thread
- barbariangrunge 3y agodevils advocate: if it wasn't subscribers only, google's crawler would be stealing it right now to train an ai with, ie, illegally creating derivative works based on their articles
- accrual 3y agoMaybe there's a market in the future for "AI-restricted" content. You can send your payment/tokens/etc. to access the content and the user is bound by a no-AI-clause. Because this content would be rare and can't be found via models, it offers a niche market.
- selcuka 3y agoGoogle's crawler can still crawl it. The regwall is only for humans: https://archive.is/GmVKl https://archive.is/GmVKl Also the article seems to be written by an LLM anywway, so it wouldn't matter in the end.
- aaur0 3y agoI wanted to delete the other link, but hackernews doesn't allow me to do so. Also, I need to figure out why the link is subscriber-only. It was not intentional.