I haven't heard that one before, but it makes sense. but of course it's never just one thing. and what "sexy" is to any given woman is highly variable. to a s

I haven't heard that one before, but it makes sense. but of course it's never just one thing. and what "sexy" is to any given woman is highly variable. to a significant extent, human males do become sexier as they increase in wealth, or simply in distinction. are these qualities that will make a son likelier to reproduce? probably yes. but they also increase the whole family's general security and therefore the mother's chance of bringing a healthy child to term in the first place. and the chance that the woman will survive to have multiple children. and that the family will be accepted in a protective community, etc. and who's to say there is no deep, obscure strategy guiding the mating process? Maybe I'm watching too many Michael Levin videos on YouTube, but perhaps there is an "intelligent" navigation of the genomic/body shape vector space that may have cross-species/ecosystem strategies we're incapable of understanding ...