> MTF "transwomen" are not women. That's not an opinion, it's biological fact ... they never had a uterus or other female sex organs and almost zero had a XX ch

> MTF "transwomen" are not women. That's not an opinion, it's biological fact ... they never had a uterus or other female sex organs and almost zero had a XX chromosome A favorite technique of bad-faith arguers and spreaders of disinformation is to take a very narrow definition a word (often overly narrow), derive some conclusion about it, and then apply that conclusion to a much broader definition of that word. You've started by picking a definition of "biological women" that sounds somewhat reasonable (but certainly not completely agreed upon, especially regarding "other female sex organs"), and then used that to justify the statement "MTF 'transwomen' are not women.". But that 2nd use of the word "women" is very different. Nobody who posts that on Twitter really means "MTF trans women do not have uteruses and most do not have XX chromosomes". Nobody is confused on this point. They mean "MTF trans women are not 'real women', and therefore it's OK to mistreat them." I think you know this. > the _group_ of folks who select "Black" or similar has a lower median on IQ tests I will accept this statement exactly as stated as being true, but that's not how you're using it. This statement does not come unburdened with a ton of other (false) assumptions behind it. The most obvious one is that you seem to think this statement justifies the claim "blacks have a lower average IQ than other races" -- No! That is a completely different claim. Note the word "race" here. That statement is talking about "blacks as a race", really meaning "genetic, innate features of humans belonging to the race 'black'." Even the existence of such a race is reasonable to dispute, but the biggest problem is going from a correlation between IQ scores and specific group of people to a causation about why that group of people has low IQ scores (i.e. because of their race). That is not true, and has been basically totally debunked. But look at how many more words it took me to address the statements, compared to making them in the first place. It was an extremely subtle change from "group that checks 'black'" to "race", yet the latter very clearly implies innate features while the former does not. It's a one-sided fight, and censorship is a perfectly reasonable tool to even the odds. There are very subtle ways that such "facts" can be completely misused, misattributed, and misinterpreted to support hatred. That (often intentional) misuse, misattribution, and misinterpretation is hate speech.