> you were basically saying something along the lines of "there is no condition that requires someone to take psychedelics" Not that I was saying that but ok,

> you were basically saying something along the lines of "there is no condition that requires someone to take psychedelics" Not that I was saying that but ok, is there one? Edit: I'm sorry, this conversation has just gone in a very odd way and I don't know how or why. Pretty sure we got wires crossed again. Anyways, no offence.