14 ms·
I don't think you can directly translate work done by a person into calories. According to this article[1] it looks like most humans use roughly the same number
by theossuary 3y ago
I don't think you can directly translate work done by a person into calories. According to this article[1] it looks like most humans use roughly the same number of calories irregardless of physical excursion.
1: https://dupri.duke.edu/news-events/news/herman-pontzer-explains-where-our-calories-really-go-and-what-studying-humanitys https://dupri.duke.edu/news-events/news/herman-pontzer-expla...
- MillionOClock 3y agoIndeed this would mean my reasoning doesn't hold anymore since it's based on calorie consumption. The only thing that still surprises me, but that's no calculation and just a fact, is that you only need around 5x more joules to move a 1800kg car vs a bicycle according to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_efficiency_in_transport https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_efficiency_in_transport) even tho the car weights >18x more. On the matter of calorie burn staying stable, I had never heard of this before! Will be very interested in checking it more in detail as it seems like a very important thing to take into account when trying to loose weight, surprised this research isn't more widely known! Thanks for the feedback and article.
- theossuary 3y agoYeah it's fascinating! I don't know enough to reconcile that with the common knowledge that Olypmians can consume up to 12,000 calories a day[1]. So there may be more nuance there than my original comment let on. But it definitely shows there's some disconnect. As for dieting, I think the very common phrase, "weight loss starts in the kitchen" encapsulates the idea that you can't burn off excess calories, you can only consume less. [1]: https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=93666256 https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=936662...