4 ms·
Neat. I wonder if we'll somehow reach the point where sqlite isn't really "lite" anymore, but I'm actually not complaining. If it keeps the stability and self-c
by anyfoo 3y ago
Neat. I wonder if we'll somehow reach the point where sqlite isn't really "lite" anymore, but I'm actually not complaining. If it keeps the stability and self-containment (in multiple ways, e.g. you don't need any sqlite components outside your application, where sqlite is just linked in) up, I continue to be happy. And if that works even with fast concurrency and fine-granular locking, great...
- kjeetgill 3y agoDon't quote me, but I think the name isn't meant to be SQL-lite but SQL-ite with the suffix meaning rock/stone.