> Also, your points very strongly suggest that the paradox of the intolerance would apply here. Your response suggests you don't understand my points at all.

> Also, your points very strongly suggest that the paradox of the intolerance would apply here. Your response suggests you don't understand my points at all. The "paradox of tolerance" could just as easily be invoked by Orbán, Erdoğan, Trump, the Christian churches, etc. I suspect Orbán and Erdoğan HAVE. Once we give "society" the ability to decide what is and is not "hate speech", you give people you oppose and fear the ability to decide what is and is not "hate speech". The answer to that isn't to craft a better definition of "hate speech", or create a permanent majority of your particular brand of ideology, it's to eliminate the idea that any group should oppress the other based upon what they believe. It's a tenet of liberalism.