3 ms·
> Different technologies aren't inherently better or worse than other technologies. That's a rather wild interpretation (to put it midly). You have compared t
by knighthack 3y ago
> Different technologies aren't inherently better or worse than other technologies.
That's a rather wild interpretation (to put it midly).
You have compared things on subjective terms; i.e. about BASIC being better on a limited old Apple. But that's not the same as how some technologies are objectively better or worse than others.
I'd have understood if you were comparing things on the measure of engineering tradeoffs - but instead you speak in absolutes about the 'betterness' of a technology that you do not prefer, over one known to be slow and bloated (ReactJS). That seems questionable.
- OhMeadhbh 3y agoReactJS is objectively bad for an Apple ][ with 16kb. Also, there's nothing in the statement "different technologies aren't inherently better or worse than other technologies" which requires it be interpreted in isolation or to require it to be interpreted subjectively (or objectively.) Sometimes we have to deal with the ambiguity of natural language.