"You won't be attacked" This[1] young girl would disagree with you, as would this[2] man. Also committed while in police custody, not necessarily in stations,

"You won't be attacked" This[1] young girl would disagree with you, as would this[2] man. Also committed while in police custody, not necessarily in stations, bur certainly where you could also reasonably try and claim "you won't be attacked": [3], [4] [1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/mar/01/police-custody-assault-video https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/mar/01/police-custody... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abner_Louima https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abner_Louima [3] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-64435109 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-64435109 [4] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230860978_Reported_assaults_and_observed_injuries_in_detainees_held_in_police_custody https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230860978_Reported_... It's incredibly ignorant to make out like someone visiting a police station will magically be fine, because the police are the "good guy with a gun" in your scenario. As for going into the station, it doesn't matter whether GP is "principled" or not, (a) they're allowed to carry, and (b) a car is not a holster. If GP had been concealed-carrying you wouldn't have had any argument, you're trying to criticize open-carry as if there are only certain situations where it's acceptable. If GP is legal to open-carry, they can do so wherever they like, providing particular legislation or bylaws don't prevent it. Not sure why you're deepthroating the boot, but happening to be (legally) armed while making a regular request, is not a reason to be treated suspiciously by police.