4 ms·
as sibling wrote, you do not deserve a response to show just how disingenuous you're being here is the current wikipedia section on sub-addressing: https://en.
by GhostWhisperer 3y ago
as sibling wrote, you do not deserve a response
to show just how disingenuous you're being here is the current wikipedia section on sub-addressing: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Email_address&oldid=1165990339#Sub-addressing https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Email_address&old...
- permo-w 3y agoyou're being disingenuous in your use of the word disingenuous. disingenuous is when you say something you don't mean. I don't think that's what you think. I think you disagree strongly with my opinion. my opinion may well be wrong, but it would only be disingenuous if I didn't believe it it is a less-commonly implemented feature of email addresses. whether it's possible or not, as shown in your link, is beside the point. as I illustrated, there are plenty of possible features of email that are not commonly implemented, and I've also linked to Hacker News posts of people complaining that the + sign is not implemented in enough websites. what more evidence do you need? it's very clearly not even remotely a universal standard, even as shown in the link you just listed: >Some mail services support
- GhostWhisperer 3y agonah, i really did meant disingenuous, but you are correct it is not my place to postulate on what you think or know. i apologize. you are also correct that i do not agree with you opinion; it is a well established 'standard' you're pointing out people complain that web forms don't support it but that is not an issue with the providers, just the implementation of those forms(or their backends)